INSTRUCTION
a. Write answers in your own words as far as possible and refrain from copying from the text
b. Answers of Ist Set (Part-A), IInd Set (Part-B), IIIrd Set (Part – C) and Set-IV (Case Study) must be sent
c. Mail the answer sheets alongwith the copy of assignments for evaluation & return.
d. Only hand written assignments shall be accepted.
A. First Set of Assignments: 5 Questions, each question carries 1 marks.
B. Second Set of Assignments: 5 Questions, each question carries 1 marks.
C. Third Set of Assignments: 5 Questions, each question carries 1 marks. Confine your answers
D. Forth Set of Assignments: Two Case Studies : 5 Marks. Each case study carries 2.5 marks.
to 150 to 200 Words.
FIRST SET OF ASSIGNMENTS Assignment-I = 5 Marks
ASSIGNMENTS
PART– A
1. Taking examples, explain the problems that can be encountered while strategizing.
2. Elaborate upon some of the problems associated with international performance and
compensation management. Take examples to support your answer.
3. With examples, describe the various types of Power.
4. With examples, describe the concept of the “Stuff’ of organizational culture.
5. Elaborate upon the various methods of performance appraisal.
SECOND SET OF ASSIGNMENTS Assignment-II = 5 Marks
PART– B
1. From a strategizing perspective, how important is being aware of the internal capabilities of the
organization? In light of this, explain ETOP and SAP.
2. Elaborate upon the factors that differentiate Domestic from International HRM. With examples,
describe the approaches to international recruitment
3. What is organization structure? Explain the concepts of:
Strategic HRD Page 1 of 4 IMT‐62
d. Centralization and Decentralization
4. Describe the various types of organizational culture and detail the various stages of culture
5. What is Organizational Development? Explain some OD intervention techniques.
THIRD SET OF ASSIGNMENTS Assignment-II = 5 Marks
PART– C
1. With examples, explain the purposes of the Strategic Management Process.
2. Taking examples, elaborate on the various Influence tactics.
3. Differentiate between transformational and transactional leaders.
4. Explain how HR management works as a strategic business contributor. Give examples to
5. What is organizational design? Taking examples, elaborate upon the determinants of
FOURTH SET OF ASSIGNMENTS Assignment-IV = 2.5 Each Case Study
CASE STUDY - I
Parvati Aggarwal’s NGO – Motivating her Volunteers
Mrs. Parvati Aggarwal is an affluent housewife residing at Saket in New Delhi. She is concerned about
the health of poor children who live with their families in various J. J. colonies (Jhugi, Jhompri colonies).
She has decided to form a voluntary group of about 25 housewives and single women who are not
career oriented to visit these poor neighbourhoods and help parents understand the need for taking
care of the health of their children. Twenty housewives in the neighbourhoods have volunteered to join
the group. It was decided that the group will meet every Monday morning at 9:00 AM for about I hour,
to discuss the developments in the preceding week and any new directions for the coming week. After
the meeting, refreshments would be served.
It was also decided that Mrs. Aggarwal would be elected as the leader of the group. Mrs. Aggarwal also
encourages these volunteers to solicit funds from donors to put up scholarships in schools for these
poor children. Members are also encouraged to seek and convince doctors who would be willing to treat
these children in case they are sick, free of any charge. The group is very dedicated and enthusiastic
about this project. Most of the members being religious feel that they are doing a religious and moral
Meetings are scheduled to be held at 9:00 AM sharp every Monday. After the first few weeks, it was
noticed that many of the volunteers were not coming on time. They have been filtering in every 5 or 10
minutes until almost 10:00 AM. Mrs. Aggarwal has felt that she has to delay the start of the meetings
Strategic HRD Page 2 of 4 IMT‐62
until all the volunteers arrive. The last few weeks, the meetings have not started until 10:00 AM. Many a
Mrs. Aggarwal fails to understand the reasons behind this tardiness. She feels it is important to start the
meetings so that they can finish in time. On the other hand, she feels that her hands are tied because
after all the people are volunteers and she cannot reprimand them or make them get to the meetings
on time. She is willing to change the time for the start of the meetings to 10:00 AM but feels that
Indians, in general, are not time bound and if the meetings were changed to start at 10:00 AM, the
volunteers will probably not all come until 11:00 AM.
1. What could be the reasons behind such tardiness? (1)
2. What can Parvati Aggarwal do to encourage everyone to come to the weekly meetings on time?
3. How can one avoid such situations in the office context? (0.5)
CASE STUDY-II
Issues with Worker’s Empowerment Policies – Union Reps in Management
It was past 4 pm and Purushottam Kshirsagar was still at his shop‐floor office. The small but elegant
office was a perk he was entitled to after he had been nominated to the board of Horizon Industries (P)
Ltd., as workman‐director six months ago. His shift generally ended at 3 pm and he would be home by
late evening. But that day, he still had long hours ahead of him.
Kshirsagar had been with Horizon for over twenty years. Starting off as a substitute mill‐hand in the
paint shop at one of the company's manufacturing facilities, he had been made permanent on the job
five years later. He had no formal education. He felt this was a handicap, but he made up for it with a
willingness to learn and a certain enthusiasm on the job. He was soon marked by the works manager as
someone to watch out for. Simultaneously, Kshirsagar also came to the attention of the president of the
Horizon Employees' Union who drafted him into union activities.
Even while he got promoted twice during the period to become the head colour mixer last year,
Kshirsagar had gradually moved up the union hierarchy and had been thrice elected secretary of the
Labour‐management relations at Horizon were not always cordial. This was largely because the
company had not been recording a consistently good performance. There were frequent cuts in
production every year because of go‐slows and strikes by workmen‐most of them related to wage hikes
Strategic HRD Page 3 of 4 IMT‐62
With a view to ensuring a better understanding on the part of labour, the problems of company
management, the Horizon board, led by chairman and managing director Avinash Chaturvedi, began to
toy with the Idea of taking on a workman on the board. What started off as a hesitant move snowballed,
after a series of brainstorming sessions with executives and meetings with the union leaders, into a
situation in which Kshirsagar found himself catapulted to the Horizon board as workman‐director. It was
an untested ground for the company. But the novelty of it all excited both the management and the
labour force. The board members‐all functional heads went out of their way to make Kshirsagar
comfortable and the latter also responded quite well. He got used to the ambience of the boardroom
and the sense of power it conveyed. Significantly, he was soon at home with the perspectives of top
management and began to see each issue from both sides.
It was smooth going until the union presented a week before the monthly board meeting, its charter of
demands, one of which was a 30 per cent across‐the‐board hike in wages. The matter was taken up at
the board meeting as part of a special agenda. "Look at what your people are asking for", said
Chaturvedi, addressing Kshirsagar with a sarcasm that no one in the board missed. 'You know the
precarious finances of the company. How could you be a party to a demand that simply can't be met?
You better explain to them how ridiculous the demands are'. he said.
"I don't think they can all be dismissed as ridiculous", said Kshirsagar. “And the board can surely
consider the alternatives. We owe at least that much to the union". But Chaturvedi adjourned the
meeting in a huff, mentioning, once again to Kshirsagar that he should 'advise the union properly'.
When Kshirsagar told the executive committee members of the union that the board was simply not
prepared to even consider the demands, he immediately sensed the hostility in the room. 'You are a sell
out", one of them said. 'Who do you really represent‐us or them?" asked another. "Here comes the
crunch', thought Kshirsagar. And however hard he tried to explain, he felt he was talking to a wall.
A victim of divided loyalties, he himself was unable to understand whose side he was on. Perhaps the
best course would be to resign from the board. Perhaps he should resign both from the board and the
union. Or may be resign from Horizon itself and seek a job elsewhere. But, he felt, silting in his office a
little later, "none of it could solve the problem”.
Answer these questions:
1. What are the problems identified in this case? (1)
2. What are the challenges one can face in managing employee empowerment and worker’s
participation in management policies? (1)
3. What can Kshirsagar do to resolve this situation? (0.5)
|